Letter to Premier Doug Ford



PREMIER DOUG FORD Regardless of one’s political leanings, I’m sure working class families appreciate that your objectives are honorable and hopefully attainable. There are always blockades arising to complicate progress.  

REMINDER: We have been in touch with you since January 2024. Your office stated that there were great things happening in April / May 2024.                   So far…CRICKETS!

We see that you tossed 6 million plus tax dollars at affordable homes in Barrie. What does that cover? The drawings or maybe 10 homes? What stupid people are you jumping for? Certainly not landowners that have invested in their family needs and cannot move forward. That will be the legacy of “private property watershed”.

I am John Tait, Mr. Premier, your former, Etobicoke, neighbor, retired cop, Wally patron, and a supporter of your brother Rob. As Robbie predicted, the gravy train is over-flowing. 

All the targets that you refer to in this year’s address are undermined by red tape so congratulations on your successes thus far.

You may recall… I was a director of an Ontario company “Gold Insight Resources Ltd”

and we needed your help to access the Ontario Securities Commission’s locked door policy. Thanks to you and Vic Fedeli we were able to have a meeting with that agency and some justice levied. “Torstar Sunday, December 5 2021” Mori crime family. Litigation on going this date. Thankyou

NEW ISSUE PREMIER We believe, that all landowners, and our premier have mutual concerns regarding this “illegal federal watershed” that is breaching our inherent private property rights and peaceful occupancy. These policies suppress growth in entire areas.

UNTIL Conservatives opened this can no one was really informed of the consequences.


We the people are waking up to this FEDERAL WATERSHED STUDY. legally it is questionable, and appearing to be nothing more than a LIBERAL control mechanism on private property . This so-called study was implemented by the Trudeau government, it appears that ANYONE affected by this encumbrance / infringement has lost a massive amount of their equity and control of their property. Anything but democratic, Doug.  We know the real plan of course. We are not hyped up conspirators just peed off tax victims.


Our family, like most families, were totally unaware of the complications imposed by this infringement, until we attempted to move forward with the help of MORE HOMES

We were shocked by this ridiculous surprise intrusion and told, by a “senior planner” at a meeting that we could do “NOTHING” with our property. I won’t bore you with details of that at this time. See our website in URL   We need your support and you ours.       


http://www.watersheddebacle.ca             in progress

You must be aware that most people, including OREA executives and realtors, were not officially briefed or notified regarding the extent of this catastrophic loss of equity and  time The expense for farmers, landowners, businesses, vendors and purchasers appears suppressed by omission. This is likely the result of just blatant disregard and lack of concern by our immediate individual authorities who obviously follow the direction of the Trudeau puppet masters. THEY want control Premier as wide eyed MP.Cheryl Gallant wrote about.in the “Landowner voices” magazine. FACTS.

Planning officials have a duty of care, so what are they hiding from taxpayers?



A class action may be necessary to get rid of the private property watershed infringement AND pay us for our massive losses at the hands of these township puppets and NOT with taxpayer funds. This is their negligence and is clearly                   BASED ON THE DUTY IMPOSED BY TORT AND COMMON LAW.

DUTY OF CARE    Many examples

The outcome of some negligence cases depends on whether the defendant owed a duty to the plaintiff. A duty arises when the law recognizes a relationship between the defendant and the plaintiff requiring the defendant to act in a certain manner. A judge ordinarily determines whether a defendant owed a duty of care to a plaintiff, and will usually find that a duty exists if a reasonable person would find that a duty exists under similar circumstances.

FRAUD BY OMISSION      Causing  considerable losses

Sometimes a person can perpetrate a fraud through the omission of a material fact. For this reason, when alleging fraud, a plaintiff may allege that the defendant made “a misrepresentation or a material omission of fact which was false and known to be false.” 


There are 38000 farms in Ontario and thousands more concerned property owners. They will soon be advised of their losses and by today’s prices may well be a minimum of 100K per qualified plaintiff. We will have a working algorithm for simple calculation. A second separate issue is the long term potential losses of landowners.


MR. PREMIER THIS INVESTIGATION IS A WORK IN PROGRESS and will hopefully be ready for the media release this fall. Please contact us and we will provide continual access to the “WATERSHED DEBACLE” website.

Our draft statement of claim is dependent upon plaintiff’s statements, losses, and the sheer number of claimants. 


PLEASE SUPPORT US DOUG many landowners need your help.

JOIN THE EFFORT!   OR GIVE US ACCESS TO YOUR POOL OF PROFESSIONALS. This is a vast number of landowners and families.

This is an evil tyrannical government intrusion. We are avoiding the watershed guidelines legal ease and wordsmithing,

We will address the losses and pursue the obvious. Let defendants go after the feds for compensation they allowed this to happen, not we the taxpayer. This could be provincial or Canada wide, starting in Severn but extending outward.

Thank you again

From John Tait and family

and those landowners that are waking up quickly.


Similar Posts