CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT Owners: Information for Plaintiffs and Defendants

To Plaintiffs and Potential Defendants: Regarding Potential Class Action

Notable: We, the Taits, are determined to pursue a class action lawsuit to address the significant injustices we and other landowners have suffered due to systemic failures and breaches of trust by municipal and planning authorities. John Tait has been designated as the “representative plaintiff.” This initiative is self-funded by the Taits, with no financial contributions requested from registrants.

Registration is free, and we aim to minimize legal costs by conducting thorough research and presenting findings to our legal advisors. This approach, while time-intensive, ensures that legal fees are kept manageable. The Taits estimate that their property has suffered an equity loss of approximately $220,000 due to a two-tier pricing system devised by members of the Coalition of Landowners and Realtors (COLAR). Preliminary findings from this initiative suggest minimum equity losses of $100,000 per affected property.

Findings

The following potential offences, as identified by the Taits, have been submitted for review by legal advisors and plaintiffs. These findings represent our perspective, as John Tait is not a lawyer but a concerned landowner seeking justice.

1. Peripheral Breaches:

   • Negligence under TORT and COMMON LAW statutes has led to substantial equity losses.

   • Torts in Common Law: These laws, inherited from England and Wales, emphasize duty of care, fairness, and the protection of individual rights. Neglecting these principles has caused irreparable harm to property owners.

2. Trespassing:

   • Property rights have been infringed upon without proper warrants or just cause. By law, a sign or gate should deny entry unless specific legal conditions are met.

   • Landowners are advised to secure original patented claims tied to their properties. These claims, issued by the Crown, are designed to protect original entitlements but have been disregarded in current municipal practices.

3. Basic Landowner Rights:

   • Fundamental rights outlined in Section 1(A) of the 1960 Charter include life, liberty, security, and property enjoyment. These rights are being violated without due process.

   • Other legal protections, such as the Trespass to Property Act and Section 34 of the Criminal Code of Canada (C.C.C.), are being ignored, eroding the trust between landowners and municipal authorities.

4. Spying and Privacy Invasion:

   • Drones and satellites have been used to collect unauthorized data, leading to privacy breaches and damage to property values. These actions deny peaceful occupancy and violate legal requirements for consent and warrants.

5. Mischief and Property Damage:

   • Financial losses have been inflicted through baseless claims of unusable land and misrepresentation of property conditions.

   • Example: The Taits purchased their property with a minor wetland hazard 12 years ago. A proposal for four development lots was recently denied, despite being far from the wetland. This denial, based on unverified watershed data, represents clear misrepresentation and negligence.

Expropriation

The Taits allege that constructive expropriation of land has been carried out under the guise of the U.N.'s Agenda 2030, without landowner consent or consultation.

• Equity losses were imposed without corresponding tax reductions, exacerbating financial harm.

• The lack of transparency in this process further highlights the disregard for landowner rights.

Corruption and Extortion

Municipal representatives have allegedly abused their power by enforcing compliance with questionable regulations and shifting the burden of proof onto landowners.

• Landowners are forced to pay for their own defenses against these unjust measures.

• Representatives have failed to provide crucial reports and feasibility studies to affected property owners, further eroding trust.

Fraud and Breach of Trust

Numerous breaches of duty are alleged, including:

• Fraudulent misrepresentation of facts and deceitful omissions.

• Failure to protect landowners in accordance with their sworn duties and mission statements.

• Alignment with external agendas, such as the U.N. Agenda 2030, at the expense of local communities.

Going Forward...

The Taits urge all affected landowners to share their experiences and evidence at info.watersheddebacle@gmail.com. We are committed to advocating for:

• Transparency and accountability in municipal governance.

• The recovery of financial losses and protection of landowner rights.

• Collaboration with realtors who prioritize property rights and fair pricing practices.

Conclusion

The Taits’ fight is not just about recovering personal losses; it is about exposing systemic failures, challenging corruption, and ensuring a fair and transparent process for all landowners. We encourage everyone who has faced similar injustices to stand with us in seeking justice and accountability.

Register on our homepage to share your experiences and evidence at www.watersheddebacle.ca