RESPONSE TO ALISON GRAY - COUNCIL SECRETARY

WE KNOW WHAT YOUR DOING

AND WHAT YOUR NOT DOING

RESPONSE TO ALISON GRAY, COUNCIL SECRETARY

Attempt to justify the watershed encumbrance along with the planning department.  There is no denying as shown below. Join our lawsuit.  MINIMUM $100,000 dollar loss for any affected property.

John Tait wrote;              

COUNCIL MEMBERS:  We strongly suggest that your board subscribe and follow the simple Kicklei protocols to exit the foreign interference in municipal governance.  Listen to Maggie Braun, Gather 2030 and protect your taxpayers. That is why you were elected by the people. There are great councilors supporting the Kicklei protocols. Tell us why you are not?

EVERYONE: read WORLD ON MUTE By lawyer LISA MIRON and her many informed contributors. Amazon 

EVERYONE:  especially property owners.  Thank you to those sensible souls that realize what has been done to us. Watch and share this movie. This affects your families.   WHO does our council pay allegiance to?    FOREIGN DICTATORS?

theagendafilm.com   The Agenda Film - Their Vision - Your Future | Oracle Films       What the mocking bird media does not tell you.

Our storage sheds led us to the watershed debacle that has destroyed our personal property value. We want personal compensation and not from our treasury.

This is a Supreme Court ruling, simple common law,

Like a traffic accident “I damage your car, I pay for your car” Our property is a write-off $220.000 dollar loss.

POSSIBLY:   INSTITUTIONAL CORRUPTION, in Canada. The use of political power for political gain,by  government officials?   QUESTION EVERYTHING.

Call your realtor and ask, “Is my property encumbered by a watershed designation?” JOIN US.

Alison responded and stated in black print….

Tait responded in red print….

Greenlands & Storage Building(s)

Inbox

Alison Gray                                                                                                                                                                                           Jul 17, 2025, 12:38 PM (4

days ago) to me 

Hello,              

Further to our conversation, the intent of the Greenlands land designation and zoning, covers a large portion of Severn is to ensure lands are maintained primarily in their natural state.

RESPONSE: That’s fine Alison, then you will have no problem advising us by who, what, and when these decisions were made and the justification for the expense dumped on uninformed landowners.

With the unbelievable amount of money involved, taxpayers deserve to see the spread sheets and the meetings held by council to protect us. You think?

Who went on all our individual properties uninvited?

Who did those amazing subterranean investigations, on ALL those Severn properties, with ground penetrating radar while protecting the Easter Bunny? 

Egregious taking requires egregious justification. TELL US.

Unfortunately, following a discussion with our Planning & Building Divisions, you cannot have the shed/structures on the property at this time as it violates the Township’s Zoning By-law.

RESPONSE:  Geezus Alison that would leave only 148 acres out of about 150 acres. WARRANTLESS ENTRY TO OUR PROPERTY? See notice re: continuity of evidence applying to ALL Severn watershed AFFECTED properties. The watershed is fraud by omission, doing this to people is breaching the trust afforded to you.  My drive shed was there for 13 years protecting lumber and tools. Much losses incurred by this negligence and overreach. Do those peace officers that attended our property as “independent agents of the crown”, have a senior independent officer within the chain of command? Sr. Planner Katie Mandeville, in an email, stated that “they” had no jurisdiction on a private road and she refused an invite. 

Due to the Greenlands designation and zoning, you would need to retain a Qualified Professional such as a Biologist or Ecologist to evaluate the environmental constraints of the property prior to the submission of a Zoning By-law Amendment application. Together with a Land Use Planning Consultant the environmental professional could assist you in the submission of a complete Zoning By-law Amendment application.

RESPONSE: If you know that just do it for us it must have been done already to justify this egregious encumbrance. Do you know what your saying? Our elected officials and their NGO foreign gatekeepers did not protect us. Every landowner should sue personally for that minimum loss of 100,000 dollars. (See Supreme Court Findings)  Halifax

Show us the investigations and the projected losses to landowners and how you protected us. Now we must pay to prove your wrong? WOW!  You people have no skin in the game but you want a piece of ours?  

With respect to your July 3^rd email respecting to the Ontario Building Code (OBC) and the sections you’ve highlighted, while a municipality may not proceed with prosecution for the original offence under the Building Code Act after a year. If the Chief Building Official is aware of unauthorised or new construction, the municipality still has the option to pursue an Order and enforcement under the Building Code Act.  If a new Order were to be issued, and then not complied with, the Chief Building Official has a year to proceed to court to address the non-compliance noted in the Order.

RESPONSE:  In the meantime please refrain from entering our property as our letter advises. Our lawsuit will cover all the questionable egregious actions by our officials acting on foreign directives. This total control of land on behalf of NGOs and PCPs is quite communistic. You only look after yourselves. You were elected to fight for us.

At this time, the Township wants to conduct an inspection to determine the status of the non-complying structures, and to ensure no further work has been done since last since Cody & Nick’s 2022 visit. 

RESPONSE:   Do not implicate Nick Ippolito?  He was never on our property and Cody took those photos 3 years ago. I hereby advise that zero work has been done and they are only storage sheds and have been there for 13 years. Is this the garbage we pay for?

These expensive demands that you make require proper address by FOIA or subpoena. We need to know everything. We are compiling our requests for FOIA and it is large.

Why do we pay for incompetence? We just want our money back and the green crap gone. You have destroyed people’s property and their retirements while they pay for yours. AND Yes! You’re welcome.

Every property in Severn that has been constructively expropriated needs reconciliation. Not from other taxpayers again. From perpetrators. We will remain open to conversation through our lawyers as we move forward with this lawsuit registry. In the meantime we need an accounting and justification of our massive tax increases. Why has our land depreciated while our taxes increased?  (SEE THE SUPREME COURT FINDINGS)

Thank you,

Alison

It only gets worse as we dig.  www.watersheddebacle.ca   sign up folks                

This amounts to control of our land, over taxation and devaluation. Landowners are hereby denying, textually, under the Canada Evidence act, all officials, accessing any plaintiff’s property without warrant or invite, pending the courts determination.  

All properties affected by the watershed are subject to class action enquiry until landowners are notified of the watershed infringement.   REGISTER NOW OR EMAIL JOHN TAIT     info.watersheddebacle@gmail.com 

LEAVE A PHONE NUMBER, if you are so inclined.