D3 BASIC FACT FINDING QUESTIONS FOR POTENTIAL PLAINTIFFS AND REAL ESTATE BROKERS THAT HAVE NOT BEEN OFFICIALLY NOTIFIED BY LOCAL AUTHORITIES.
What formal notifications were given to you, the landowner, by authorities or by their risk management teams?
Yes / No
What formal notifications were given to you, the landowner, by authorities or by their risk management teams?D
Yes / No
Was any formal notification given to you at all, as a landowner, with respect to the watershed infringement, by authorities?
Yes / No
Has this watershed study affected your property value or do you know? ( see realty page for assessment)
Yes / No
Were you ever formally, invited personally by authorities, to inject landowner input?
Yes / No
Was a proper request submitted to you asking permission to enter onto your land to do this invasive study?
Yes / No
Following the study, were you provided with a final report from the local authorities showing the methods used to draw their conclusions about the watershed? Did authorities tell you who the scientists were that calculated the water flow direction and amount of water flow that has now disrupted the value and the peaceful occupation of your property? We’re there any, does the study of your property even exist?
Yes / No
Were you supplied with formal documents, indicating the estimated losses that would be incurred following the watershed infringement?
Yes / No
Did the officials meet with you and your family and explain in detail the damage to your property value and perhaps your retirement investment? Do they care, you already paid for theirs?
Yes / No
Are other family members suffering potential losses due to the destruction of their plans and dreams for the future of your property?
Yes / No
Did they send you any postal communication to help protect your family investment and avoid the equity loss?
Yes / No
Who actually walked through your property, illegally, to formulate this study? Do we need a judicial setting to find that out?
Yes / No
Was there a media blitz from authorities informing taxpayers of the possible consequences of this study?
Yes / No
What formal notifications were given to you, the landowner, by authorities or by their risk management teams?
Yes / No
Ask Doug Ford about his Oak Ridges Moraine debacle?
- Email: doug.fordco@pc.ola.org
- Constituency Office: Ph. 4167452859
- Address: 823 Albion Rd. Etobicoke, Ontario M9V 1A3
- Fourth, a bit more description
QUESTIONS – for Potential Participants
Is the government “Watershed Study” controlling many properties across the country?
2
This study was brought in nationally. Farmers and property owners are mostly unaware of the issues and the losses incurred. The only reason that we, the Taits, found out was because of our attempt to sever some lots on our 188 acre Severn Ontario property. John Tait and his family are disgusted.
THIS IS OUR MESSAGE….
At this stage and with the help of this website the Tait family has, on behalf of property owners in general, started this investigation to determine how deep this breach of trust by officials may have affected “we the people”. Find out if you qualify to Join our “potential” class action suit. Read and answer the questions below. Contact your friends and neighbors and help them to address these questions. Give them our website and tell them to follow the “Guidelines to Participate”.
this investigation show that town planners and others in authority have withheld or omitted effective information from landowners and consequently caused said landowners to suffer heavy monetary losses. At this time we require specific information from plaintiffs to ascertain their qualifications for participation. This is potentially a multi-million dollar class action suit.
The lawsuit would be based on the negligent lack of official information and transparency by planning departments and planning officials. If we, Canadian landowners were not officially informed of potential losses or tax reductions. Our representatives have shown a total disregard for our inherent property rights and protections. (see legal page).
Planning department’s lack of action, and information suppression within this watershed study, appears to have damaged our properties actual value, its dynamic potential value and over taxation. (see legal)
Farmers around the world are rising up and defending their operations. If need be, let’s get rid of the dead wood in a judicial setting. Privatization?
The OFA was contacted…response pending 6 C
We have notified the Ontario Federation of Agriculture, 200 Hanlon Creek Boulevard Guelph, On NICA1 Tel 1-800-668-3276. We hope to notify all farms in Ontario for their input. 38,000 farms. We still look forward to a positive supportive stance.
The OLA was contacted…
The OLA has been contacted.
The Ontario Landowners Association OLA shall defend property rights in Ontario, promote the principle of strong local governments, democracy, and natural justice and represent the interests of the rural Ontario community. The Ontario Landowners Association goals and objectives shall be to uphold fundamental principles of Ontario land owners. The OLA has a free magazine / newsletter “Landowner voices” and a new “you tube” channel. All great stuff check it out.
Text John Tait with any suggestions regarding the exposure of the “law suit inquiry” to potential claimants.
At this preliminary stage there will be NO FEE to participate in the process. We are determining the number of participants in order to move forward.
On website launch we will supply a simple document for lawsuit participants to submit with all their pertinent information, including a simple synopsis of events. This will be done on the app. “mailchimp” and this is in progress.
Form requests will be supplied for real estate brokers to assess losses incurred by participants. The percentage differential would be applied to the pursuit of a TAX REDUCTION for victims based on EQUITY LOSSES AND INTEREST.
GUIDELINES TO PARTICIPATE:
At this preliminary stage of the investigation there will be NO FEE to participate in the process. We are just determining the number of participants in order to move forward. Updated information to our website will be on-going. Location of property by postal code will determine the planning office responsible for individual properties. Severn Planning is first.
Legal issues are being reviewed by our legal team and financial issues by our accounting firm. These professionals will be updating our webpage as is deemed necessary.
FORM 1: QUALIFICATION
We will supply a simple document (Form1) for potential lawsuit participants to submit with yes or no answers to basic information, and possibly including a synopsis of events if necessary. Incorporating the app. “mailchimp”
FORM 2: LOSS ASSESSMENT
We will supply a document (Form2) for your real estate broker to assess actual losses incurred by participants based on the property value before the watershed infringement and by deducting the reduced value following the watershed infringement. (see realty)
That loss, as a percentage, of the real value before the watershed infringement, would be applied as a tax reduction claim based on that percentage of recent billings.
These claims are in accordance with Tort Law sec. which states…(see legal)
REALTORS:
Having had conversation with realtors it appears that they too were suppressed, and uninformed by negligent authorities, consequently, sellers and purchasers were uninformed.
Was there an alert sent out in your tax notices regarding the pitfalls of this study?
Yes / No
Was there a tax adjustment based on the reduced property value percentage?
Yes / No
Did planning officers run any advisory ads in regards to the negative impact of this study?
Yes / No
Did planning officials post an alert in the legal gazette?
Yes / No
Were you given proper instructions for the appeal process ?
Yes / No
What the hell did they do other than disrupt peoples lives and why?
Yes / No
Were existing alternative engineering and construction solutions presented to you by authorities?
Yes / No
DOUG FORD DETAILS UNDER THESE Q.
4 BASIC FACT FINDING QUESTIONS FOR POTENTIAL PLAINTIFFS AND REAL ESTATE BROKERS THAT HAVE NOT BEEN OFFICIALLY NOTIFIED BY LOCAL AUTHORITIES. C
What formal notifications were given to you, the landowner, by authorities or by their risk management teams?
Yes / No
Was any formal notification given to you at all, as a landowner, with respect to the watershed infringement, by authorities?
Yes / No
Has this watershed study affected your property value or do you know? ( see realty page for assessment)
Yes / No
Were you ever formally, invited personally by authorities, to inject landowner input?
Yes / No
Was a proper request submitted to you asking permission to enter onto your land to do this invasive study?
Yes / No
Following the study, were you provided with a final report from the local authorities showing the methods used to draw their conclusions about the watershed? Did authorities tell you who the scientists were that calculated the water flow direction and amount of water flow that has now disrupted the value and the peaceful occupation of your property? We’re there any, does the study of your property even exist?
Yes / No
Were you supplied with formal documents, indicating the estimated losses that would be incurred following the watershed infringement?
Yes / No
Did the officials meet with you and your family and explain in detail the damage to your property value and perhaps your retirement investment? Do they care, you already paid for theirs?
Yes / No
Are other family members suffering potential losses due to the destruction of their plans and dreams for the future of your property?
Yes / No
Did they send you any postal communication to help protect your family investment and avoid the equity loss?
Yes / No
Who actually walked through your property, illegally, to formulate this study? Do we need a judicial setting to find that out?
Yes / No
Was there a media blitz from authorities informing taxpayers of the possible consequences of this study?
Yes / No
Was there an alert sent out in your tax notices regarding the pitfalls of this study?
Yes / No
Was there a tax adjustment based on the reduced property value percentage?
Yes / No
Did planning officers run any advisory ads in regards to the negative impact of this study?
Yes / No
Did planning officials post an alert in the legal gazette?
Yes / No
Were you given proper instructions for the appeal process ?
Yes / No
What the hell did they do other than disrupt peoples lives and why?
Yes / No
Were existing alternative engineering and construction solutions presented to you by authorities?
Yes / No
d.ford 3
d
4 BASIC FACT FINDING QUESTIONS FOR POTENTIAL PLAINTIFFS AND REAL ESTATE BROKERS THAT HAVE NOT BEEN OFFICIALLY NOTIFIED BY LOCAL AUTHORITIES.
Were they just too busy with their clandestine watershed study? Are they really planners? Do they even give a damn?
Yes / No
If they actually did give a damn they would they have helped their neighbors with the opportunity to appeal the process? Surely they would have arranged a hearing on behalf of the taxpayers? Do they work for us or not?
Yes / No
Did the planning officers caution farmers, realtors and landowners about the potential implications faced by sellers and purchasers regarding these studies?
Yes / No
Did town planners advise real estate offices and the brokers to post official warnings or advisory documents to their clients?
Yes / No
Were official government documents supplied for review by sellers and purchasers, for their protection?
Yes / No
5 KEEP EDIT DO YOU QUALIFY TO ENGAGE IN THIS SUIT AS A PLAINTIFF? 5 EDIT
Were you not officially notified by your planning department about the watershed study, and the implications it has on your landowner’s equity? (thousands !) or the changes in property dynamics that has potentially affected immediate or future plans.
IF your answer is “yes” continue and remember, realtors too were not officially notified and have lost money, but, they are skilled at investigating all avenues when requested by potential clients. Ask them the following. Below is a Link. Click on Form 2.
FORM 2 ( WORK IN PROGRESS PENDING APPROVAL )
NOTE: In John Tait’s case involving his 150 plus acres, his actual losses are about $ _____ ? and his potential losses and claim, based on an outstanding housing development project, are by today’s standards and with the inherent costs deducted are about $ _____ ? Others in Severn Ontario have incurred greater losses than the Tait family.
NOTE: This potential class action would start the due process in Severn ON. where this malfeasance came to light. The claim is based on the number of victims/plaintiffs that come forward that were not informed by their planning departments AND were never afforded their right to an appeal. Landowners lost a lot of property value due to the negligence of planners AND we never even got a tax rebate. Why? Would that have let their cat out of the bag? I hope while they chase the cat that we can chase our stolen money.
THANKS JOHN TAIT AND FAMILY
The OFA was contacted…response pending
We have notified the Ontario Federation of Agriculture, 200 Hanlon Creek Boulevard Guelph, On NICA1 Tel 1-800-668-3276. We hope to notify all farms in Ontario for their input. 38,000 farms. We still look forward to a positive supportive stance.
The OLA was contacted…
The OLA has been contacted.
The Ontario Landowners Association OLA shall defend property rights in Ontario, promote the principle of strong local governments, democracy, and natural justice and represent the interests of the rural Ontario community. The Ontario Landowners Association goals and objectives shall be to uphold fundamental principles of Ontario land owners. The OLA has a free magazine / newsletter “Landowner voices” and a new “you tube” channel. All great stuff check it out.
Text John Tait with any suggestions regarding the exposure of the “law suit inquiry” to potential claimants.
At this preliminary stage there will be NO FEE to participate in the process. We are determining the number of participants in order to move forward.
On website launch we will supply a simple document for lawsuit participants to submit with all their pertinent information, including a simple synopsis of events. This will be done on the app. “mailchimp” and this is in progress.
Form requests will be supplied for real estate brokers to assess losses incurred by participants. The percentage differential would be applied to the pursuit of a TAX REDUCTION for victims based on EQUITY LOSSES AND INTEREST.
GUIDELINES TO PARTICIPATE:
At this preliminary stage of the investigation there will be NO FEE to participate in the process. We are just determining the number of participants in order to move forward. Updated information to our website will be on-going. Location of property by postal code will determine the planning office responsible for individual properties. Severn Planning is first.
Legal issues are being reviewed by our legal team and financial issues by our accounting firm. These professionals will be updating our webpage as is deemed necessary.
FORM 1: QUALIFICATION
We will supply a simple document (Form1) for potential lawsuit participants to submit with yes or no answers to basic information, and possibly including a synopsis of events if necessary. Incorporating the app. “mailchimp”
FORM 2: LOSS ASSESSMENT
We will supply a document (Form 2) for your real estate broker to assess actual losses incurred by participants based on the property value before the watershed infringement and by deducting the reduced value following the watershed infringement. (see realty)
That loss, as a percentage, of the real value before the watershed infringement, would be applied as a tax reduction claim based on that percentage of recent billings.
These claims are in accordance with Tort Law sec. which states…(see legal)
REALTORS:
Having had conversation with realtors it appears that they too were suppressed, and uninformed by negligent authorities, consequently, sellers and purchasers were uninformed.
Stay connected!