“WATERSHED DEBACLE”

 Government Is Controlling OUR Properties.

 

 

 

take action now

 

 

How did this loss happen?

                

Why were we not informed?

 

Join our team of plaintiffs

 

Watershed Debacle

the Government “Watershed Study” is Controlling Many Properties Across the Country

 

Unknown to many, a nationwide government “Watershed Study” has silently wielded control over numerous properties, leaving farmers and property owners at a loss, oblivious to the grave implications it carries.

 

The Tait family, hailing from Toronto, discovered the extent of this infringement when they sought to sever six two acre lots on their 150 acre property in Severn, Ontario. John Tait and his family, are appalled by the authorities actions and inactions. We now seek to raise awareness among fellow landowners regarding the watershed infringement and obvious monetary losses.  Minimum  100 K on each property.

 

SURPRISE RESPONSE FROM PLANNING. 

The Taits are disgusted …..remove this DISCRIMINATORY  watershed encumbrance from private properties. 

 

EMAIL FROM THE SENIOR PLANNER:   

 

“2715 Janes Lane, in Severn Township, owned by Tait’s is not eligible for six severances. The property is primarily designated green land (see image below with the GREEN color) in the County of Simcoe’s Official Plan which does not permit development, including new lot creation within the GREEN land designation. The BROWN area on the image below is designated rural and may be permitted to provide a new lot, however, all applicable land use planning policy documents would need to be complied with so a “Land Use Planning Consultant” would likely need to be retained in order to justify any lot creation within the BROWN rural area of the property.”

 

“Why authorities do this to us?  This appears to be tort negligence,  breach of trust,  fraud, discrimination and mischief  CCC 430 (1) (d) ?

 

Q1.     This GREEN land, aka watershed, did NOT control our property ten years ago when we applied for nine two-acre lots, STILL IN EFFECT, so, who, why, how, and when, was this infringement initiated?

 

Q2.    Are we taxpayers hiring others to correct the negligence and “breach of trust” by town planners?   Disgusting self serving cronyism?

It appears that the lawyers that “WE RETAINED” failed us and allowed this infringement.   Complicit?

 

Discrimination?  Corruption?  see our LEGAL narrative.

 

The TAIT family are left with about four acres of property.   Under Tort and Common Law we want our losses paid back, and so should you. This appears to be expropriation on behalf of the federal government, and is just more property control. We are intent on finding out who decided to encumber our property and yours.  CONTROL! 

  

We need to subpoena all documentation on the properties of each plaintiff and defendant along with the Risk Management Studies. 

 

See the BROWN usable areas along the water  front this is discrimination against us and all our GREENED OUT neighbours.  SEE BELOW.

WAKE UP and SIGN UP.        TELL FRIENDS. *

 

 

THIS IS OUR MESSAGE 

What has happened behind the scenes in our beautiful Severn Township? Misrepresentation by our protectors?  deceit or naivety or possibly paid off by the federal regime? What happened to our “TRUSTEES?” They are breaching their own mission statements.  Did they swear allegiance and to whom?

 

For the FULL narrative see  “THE STORY”  page.

 

To understand why, this is happening, navigate to the “Wake Up” section, and watch the Aurora video.  Joel Sussman and Cheryl Gallant know what is happening.   

Joel explains the “agenda” in the Aurora meeting. See the video in “WAKE UP”  page.

 

Great witnesses and along with others would be great town hall informants. We hope to bring our landowners together.       

CHANGE MUST OCCUR!   CLASS ACTION?

 

Empowered by this website and with the support of fellow claimants, the Tait family takes up the mantle of investigating this matter on behalf of all property owners. The objective is an investigation and a class action suit if necessary.

 

 WAKE-UP     SIGN UP     FOR FREE*

 

The core focus of this investigation is to shed light on the potential “breach of trust” and “lack of duty of care” exhibited by officials, and the far-reaching impact on “we the people”.  Our family.  our kids,  our friends. REMOVE THE WATERSHED from private property and BUILD HOMES FOR YOUR FAMILY.  THEY DON’T OWN US.

 

We encourage you to determine whether or not you qualify to participate in our “potential” class-action suit.  Stand in solidarity with property owners who have been deceived by omission and contractual breach within constitutional law.

 

Remember this. “The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.”               

– Edmund Burke

 

 

           OUR STRATEGY:  UNVEILING THE NEGLIGENCE

A CALL TO ACTION FOR AFFECTED PROPERTY OWNERS THAT MAY HAVE LOST A MINIMUM OF $100,000. 

 

We have input from professional independent mathematicians. Through a preliminary common-sense review of properties subjected to watershed infringement, we have found the following:

 

Considering the exorbitant real estate prices and local planners’ suppression of actual monetary losses, we estimate that individual landowners may have suffered a minimum loss of $100,000 (One hundred thousand dollars) per property, without accounting for potential additional losses in venture projects.  (refer to losses) in “REALTY”.

WE THE TAXPAYERS WANT CONTROL OF OUR PROPERTY, AS WE SHOULD HAVE BY LAW,  OR PAY US.

JOIN OUR LIST OF PLAINTIFFS FOR FREE – CHECK IF YOU QUALIFY.   

Note:  COMMON SENSE indicates that any encumbrance on a property reduces the value.  “EXPROPRIATION?”

 

This “investigation” aims to expose how planners and authoritative figures withheld or omitted vital information from landowners, leading to significant monetary losses. Due to their “negligence,”  they may face a class-action lawsuit to recover these losses, which, at this initial stage, could potentially reach millions of dollars (see “LEGAL” for Tort Law).

 

We need to know who the  “authority figures”  are. They had an obligation but may have failed, to notify us, the taxpaying landowners of this debacle. I know the Tait family was not protected.     WAS YOURS?

 

To participate, potential claimants are required to Sign up using our MailChimp Platform.  First, establish legitimate involvement. THE LOSSES CAN BE SUBMITTED AT A LATER DATE.  See (“REALTY”) 

 

We demand the planning department formulas that they used for determining landowner losses and tax reductions. These documents should reflect the percentage loss on each property. Where are the ledgers?  Are  “risk management”  findings available?  

 

John Tait attempted to obtain satellite overlay imagery regarding the watershed infringement from the planning department but received limited response.  The lack of direct public access to satellite imagery raises concerns about information transparency and legitimacy.  We the Tait’s were informed, about the watershed, only when we attempted to propose six lots.     SURPRISE!

 

THERE ARE SEVEN PRINCIPLES OF RISK MANAGEMENT.

 

Projects of all sizes necessitate risk management, particularly when innocent landowners are at risk. We demand to know who the risk managers are and where their reports are, to ensure that risks and losses are identified early and dealt with appropriately on behalf of taxpayers.  (see risk management principles). 

 

After self-qualification, join the info. list at the bottom of the page and sign up.  LATER WE WILL REQUIRE THE PERCENTAGE OF ENCUMBERED PROPERTY FOR EACH PLAINTIFF.  This will be calculated as the difference between the property value with the watershed infringement and its value without the watershed infringement.  See (DIY in “REALTY”) 

 

If any development proposals were presented to the council before the infringement and are now impeded because of the encumbrance,  additional losses could be considered.

 

To protect security and privacy, we utilized the “Mailchimp” platform. 

 

This investigation and a potential lawsuit are founded on the negligent lack of official information and transparency displayed by authorities. This deprivation of taxpayers’ rights and lack of notification to appeal within the legal 30-day limit, is total negligence. The planning department’s risk management findings should support our claims. 

 

This investigation and the potential lawsuit should demonstrate that landowners were not adequately informed about potential losses or applicable tax reductions. We assert that the planning department’s inaction and information suppression within the watershed rollout severely damaged our properties’ market value, resulting in over-taxation. This is about  CONTROL.  Entire segments of PRIVATE PROPERTY have been suppressed over a relatively short time. We must bring those segments back up to market value.

 

SEE M.P. CHERYL GALLANT IN THE  “WAKEUP”   –  A TRUE PATRIOT. 

 

WE DEMAND OUR LOSSES BE RIGHTFULLY RETURNED OR WITHDRAW THE WATERSHED……WAKE UP SIGN UP*

 

The government’s watershed guideline, spanning about 300 pages, represents a professionally crafted obfuscation and betrayal of property owners’ rights. We demand access to reports and spreadsheets describing the losses and re-assessments of equity. Subpoena or Foia? We must demand OUR documents regarding the appeal, done on behalf of us, the people. Who did that loss assessment? OR did they? If so, were they afraid to tell us our losses?

 

How about OUR Lawyers, the ones that we retained to protect us, we the people, AND our representatives, did they advise our representatives to inform us of the consequences, of the watershed encumbrance? Complicit?  Subpoena? or are they going to represent us?  Arms length?  

 

Through testimony, we seek to understand why the illegal invasive watershed study exists. We need to see what relevant documents were presented to property owners or if they were hidden? We propose that all legal issues related to our ecosystem should be put on hold until resolved or dissolved. Previous proposals presented to the council should be revisited.  It would be appropriate to subpoena the satellite imagery of defendants properties to see if they too lost equity.  DISCRIMINATION maybe?

 

We are confident that the “100,000 dollar minimum loss”  suffered by our proud and concerned landowners will encourage them to spread the word to friends and neighbors.  We plan to present “The Story” to a prominent “landowner-centric magazine,” directing landowners to our website for participation in the potential class-action lawsuit.

 

THIS MAY LEAD TO A NATIONWIDE INVESTIGATION WITH MULTIPLE CLASS-ACTION LAWSUITS WITH THIS WEBSITE OR THE DISSOLUTION OF THE WATERSHED ENCUMBRANCE.

 

TAKE CONTROL OF YOUR PROPERTY, AND JOIN THE TEAM. 

 

01   READ THE COURT QUESTIONS 

 

We are compiling a comprehensive case study comprising relevant questions to bring forward all the facts. Potential claimants and their families should carefully review all questions to determine eligibility as participants. The main question is WERE YOU OFFICIALLY NOTIFIED?

 

5 POINTS TO PROVE IN A TORT OF NEGLIGENCE CASE ARE:

 

1.    THE DEFENDANTS OWE THE LANDOWNERS A “DUTY OF CARE” AS PROFESSIONALS REPRESENTING WE THE PEOPLE.

 

2.    THE DEFENDANTS BREACHED THEIR “DUTY OF CARE” AND PROTECTION WITHIN THE SCOPE OF THE “REASONABLE PERSON STANDARD”.      

                                     

3.     DEFENDANTS CAUSED INJURY OR “EXCESSIVE LOSS OF EQUITY” IN THIS CASE BY THEIR OWN NEGLIGENCE.

 

4.      DEFENDANTS IGNORED THE FORESEEABLE LOSSES BY THE “REASONABLE PERSON STANDARD”.   THIS TOO IS NEGLIGENCE.

 

5.  PLAINTIFFS CLAIM FOR FINANCIAL LOSSES.   MOST LOSSES WOULD EXCEED  $100,000. NOT UNREALISTIC BY CURRENT MARKET STANDARDS  THIS IS EQUITY LOSS AND UNDER TORT LAW ARE DAMAGES.

 

02     GATHER YOUR PROPERTY INFORMATION

 

Prepare and organize all details related to your property for use in the legal process. A well-organized group of landowners will strengthen our case.  Points to prove are  #1. You own the subject property and were not officially notified by persons in authority ie: Mayor, councilors,planners and inspectors.

#2  As a result you may have lost more than 100,000 dollars.

              

 

 03 ANSWER THE QUESTIONS AND RIDE THE DOCUMENT CONVOY

 

After reviewing and answering the questions, if you believe you qualify for the class-action suit, proceed to SIGN UP at the bottom of the page AND keep up to date with progress. 

 

 04     STAY UPDATED & INFORMED 

 

We will provide updates as issues arise. Stay informed about this evolving situation. 

 

PREMIERE DOUG FORD

 

Regardless of one’s political leanings, working-class families should appreciate that your objectives are hopefully, attainable. We understand that progress is often hindered by adverse blockades, some of which you can hold yourself accountable for. Despite the cloud, the Tait’s commend you for addressing issues and challenges posed by unnecessary RED TAPE. that slows progress and growth for families. 

 

However, there is a pressing matter that demands attention—that disgusting FEDERAL WATERSHED STUDY, which appears to be a questionable and controlling mechanism on private property. We urge you to read and consider the implications outlined at www.watersheddebacle.ca (a work in progress).

 

The Tait family, like many others, was completely unaware of the complications imposed by this infringement until we attempted to move forward with the help of the MORE HOMES Act. The lack of proper briefing regarding the catastrophic loss of equity, time, and expense for landowners likely stems from a blatant disregard and lack of concern by immediate individual authorities who seem to seek control or bow to the federal regime. Authorities do have a “duty of care” under Tort Law so we question what they may be hiding. We need to recoup our losses and taxes.

 

The planning departments may have been deceived themselves by the implementation of this illegal destructive watershed study and property control. Please have the FEDS cancel this encumbrance or assist authoritarians to cover our losses. We do not need taxpayers covering legal fees for negligent authoritarians. If we must hire private planners they must hire private lawyers.

 

MR. PREMIER, THIS INVESTIGATION IS IN PROGRESS, AND READY FOR MEDIA RELEASE. WE KINDLY REQUEST THAT YOU CONTACT US FOR AN UPDATE. Thank you for your attention.

 

Sincerely, John Tait and Family 

 

 

NOTE:  A full letter was sent to Doug Ford, Pierre Poilievre, and Tim Hudak head of OREA

Here are the links below

letter to Tim Hudak

Letter to Doug Ford

   

NOTICE:  All communication with politicians will be recorded on this website. Responses positive or negative will be updated in the Blog section. 

So far Ford’s office has said there are big changes for April and May 2024. We will See!

 

 

ONTARIO REAL ESTATE ASSOCIATION (OREA)

 

OREA does not mention the watershed encumbrance in the form 100 purchase and sale agreement. Were they NOT NOTIFIED BY THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT?

 

 

 

AS OUTLANDISH AS IT MAY SEEM 

 

It is evident that governments employ various methods to influence public opinion and control the dissemination of information. Even municipalities can be subject to this influence from higher levels of government. Throughout history, we have seen thought control methods employed, such as media censorship, misinformation, disinformation, propaganda campaigns, indoctrination in education, restricting access to certain technologies or forms of communication, and even using force and intimidation to silence dissenting voices. THEY ARE GOOD AT IT.  These practices are widely considered unethical and violate fundamental human rights, including freedom of expression and freedom of thought. Moreover, the control of private properties can be a powerful tool to suppress the progress of families, causing immense mental and physical stress.  See (WAKE UP) and advise friends.

 

The watershed infringement can be subtly introduced into an area, leaving even real estate professionals unaware of the true purpose of this  encroachment and the real value of the property,  without accounting for those losses. This infringement has the potential to keep an entire area in a state of stagnation and depression. Property owners remain oblivious until a title search is required.  Even at that point they may not fully comprehend the consequences. If and when they attempt to develop the property this encumbrance will cost them dearly. Not only did the planning department not advise or warn the property owners of this debacle but now they want the landowner to pay for the POSSIBILITY that there could be a CHANCE of approval.  What B.S.   It may seem outlandish, but the impact is real and significant. 

 

THIS IS WHAT THE NOBLEMEN DID TO THEIR SERFS….. Government employees are not working for their constituents.

 

 

John Tait   

Help us to fight back!  SIGN UP as a plaintiff.

 

HOW DID THEY DO THAT?

 

OPPRESSION : “THE STATE OF BEING SUBJECT TO UNJUST TREATMENT or CONTROL”

 

The same way that they deceived our farmers, by reducing their yields, their property values, and operating lines by 30%. Why was there no 30% property tax reduction? Was this to control food supply? Why are there no law suits?

 

Check out Redacted

 

The same way that they buried all of us in mandates and forced businesses to lay off employees or shut down. They were using  fiat, counterfeit tax money, to do it. Why?  To control Income?

The same way that they got control of the media to misinform “we the victims”.

Did they control police thuggery by invoking a “war measures act”?  Did they pay off greedy politicians to abuse working people and walk on constitutional rights?  Why? Just control?

The same way that they, in conjunction with the banking cartels, shut down bank accounts. Why? Control and create chaos?

Look up  the 15 minute cities.  THE NEW LOCKDOWNS. This action is before the courts now in Britain.

 

WATERSHED INFRINGEMENT

Taking total control of a country’s property would be the totalitarianism ’s dream and that is what this looks like to us. “You will own nothing and be happy.” Were they hoping for forfeiture ? Maybe?

This watershed debacle is a federal program.  It was brought in while we the landowners were distracted by those hundreds of tyrannical moves that the government has been making over the last 60 years, culminating in the last 5 years.

We believe that the reason we and our realtors were not notified by our planning department officials regarding this study was because this would have raised the ire of some astute individuals. This would be far too transparent.

The Tait family certainly was not informed and in fact has an original pending 10 year old, preliminary proposal before council. Nine two acre lot severances presented prior to the watershed infringement. This is the recent “eyes open” moment for us.

At a June meeting in 2022 the senior planner advised that the Tait’s could do “nothing” with the property.

In this case the conservative (ridiculous) potential losses to date would be in excess of one million dollars plus the actual losses in the amount of three hundred thousand and a tax reduction. Ridiculous but not out of line with today’s construction costs and this meets with professional engineering expectations in the building industry. 

We would expect, judging by the number of potential class action participants at this time, that we may accumulate well over one hundred claimants just in the Severn area. We may need to address the issue with a protest while our farmers are still standing up.  Thank you TAMARA LICH 

Our initial investigation will encompass Severn Township and expand from there based on postal codes. Any qualified landowner in Ontario can sign up. According to the OFA there are 38000 farms in Ontario not including other properties like the Tait’s. If Ontario farms alone lose 100k dollars each, at the minimum, that is 3,800,000,000 (3.8 billion) dollarsThat is Just farms.

 

WORK IN PROGRESS. We are intent on pursuing the planning departments for their “misrepresentation of known facts” and breaching well founded “tort law” resulting in astronomical losses to landowners. This has all the appearances of a “partial expropriation of private property” without an appeal process.  We are seeking compensation. We are doing the basic investigation and we are seeking more lawyers familiar with class action suits to represent our hardworking landowners and farmers. Please contact us at info.watersheddebacle@gmail.com (to follow).

We have no intention of pursuing the authors of the “watershed study” we have gotten no response from a FOIA request. We will let the Planning SUE the federal authors if the planners become defendants.

The Taits can show that this watershed study is flawed as it relates to the Tait property, and actually contradicts the stated goals of authority. The Tait’s do not expect to pay for the mistakes made by the authorities and we hope that all other landowners will pursue this stand. There are probably many other outside claimants and we should set the templates for other lawsuits. In the meantime we have 102 postal codes in Severn Township to deal with first.

 

 

In  WAKE UP     “HOLD THE LINE”    book by TAMARA LICH      A CANADIAN HERO.

EXPLORE THE QUESTIONS, QUALIFY FOR PARTICIPATION,  AND STAY INFORMED WITH OUR PROGRESS.

 

To Reach out directly, connect using this email below

info.watersheddebacle@gmail.com

Membership is completely  FREE

Join our info list

* indicates required